HILL-JOHNSON v. BYTNER et al
DACLON HILL-JOHNSON and DAELON HILL-JOHNSON |
SGT BYTNER and ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS |
2:2019cv01390 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER DENYING #1 Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF. No. 1) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may submit another motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of the inmate account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of the Complaint. If that resubmitted motion is granted, the case will be reopened. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may reopen the case by paying the $400.00 filing fee. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Local Rule 72.C.2. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/28/2019. (jmb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DACLON HILL-JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 complaint lodged pending disposition of motion to proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.