CHITO v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
| TIMOTHY R. CHITO |
| ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC |
| 2:2019cv01403 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action. Should further proceedings be required, either party may file a motion to re-open and this case will proceed as if this order had not been entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized including, but not limited to, enforcing settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/31/2019. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than November 20, 2019. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/30/2019. (jmb)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC. (Strick, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allgheny County, case number AR-19-4789 Copies attached: Civil Cover Sheet, Exhibit A, Exhibit B: State Court Complaint and Certificate of Service (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5336441), filed by ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B:State Court Complaint, #4 Certificate of Service) (cjo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CHITO v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TIMOTHY R. CHITO | |
| Represented By: | Clayton S. Morrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Strick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
