SMITH v. QUALITY FOODS, INC.
| JAVON SMITH |
| QUALITY FOODS, INC. |
| 2:2019cv01447 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Wittlinger on behalf of JAVON SMITH. (Wittlinger, Emily) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Rabenold on behalf of JAVON SMITH. (Rabenold, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Taylor E. Gillan is terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 12/16/19. (jad)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by JAVON SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gillan, Taylor) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JAVON SMITH. QUALITY FOODS, INC. waiver sent on 11/12/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Gillan, Taylor) |
| Filing 5 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (bdb) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/7/19. (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to QUALITY FOODS, INC. (ma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against QUALITY FOODS, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5350606), filed by JAVON SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. QUALITY FOODS, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: QUALITY FOODS, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAVON SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Edward J. Feinstein |
| Represented By: | Taylor E. Gillan |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Rabenold |
| Represented By: | Emily Wittlinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
