CHEW v. GILMORE et al
| LEE ALAN CHEW |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON and ROBERT GILMORE |
| 2:2019cv01451 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk of Court is to mark this case closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner may reopen the case by paying the $5.00 filing fee or submitting a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of the account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of the complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days will constitute waiver of the right to appeal Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 11/29/2019. (jmb)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending receipt of filing fee or disposition of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
