RUHE v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
| BETHANY RUHE |
| PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2019cv01474 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Twilla, Daniel) |
Filing 16
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that the parties' Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process are due by 1/14/20; A Case Management Conference is set for 1/21/20 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom 5B before Judge Nora Barry Fischer. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/17/19. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (jg)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #11 is denied; that Defendant shall file its Answer by 1/3/20. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/17/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 14 BRIEF in Opposition re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BETHANY RUHE. (Tuk, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION re #11 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS filed by BETHANY RUHE. (Tuk, Joseph) Modified text on 12/23/2019. (cjo) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF in Support re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Twilla, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Conferral) (Twilla, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT re Conferral on Motion to Dismiss by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Twilla, Daniel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER upon consideration of Defendant Progressive Advanced Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss #6 , and Brief in Support #7 , which do not include a certificate of conferral "stating that the moving party has made good faith efforts to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment," as required by the Court's Order of 11/12/19 #4 , which further provides that "[m]otions to dismiss that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied," it is hereby ordered that said Motion #6 is denied, without prejudice; that the parties shall meet and confer as the Court has directed and file a Status Report with the Court by 12/3/19. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/19/19. (jg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON MOTIONS PRACTICE (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/16/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 7 BRIEF in Support re #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Twilla, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Twilla, Daniel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER indicating that on or before 12/3/19, all counsel to the above captioned case shall become registered users of the CM/ECF system. Any attorney who is not registered by 12/3/19, will no longer receive notice regarding any docketing activity in this case initiated from chambers by U.S. mail. This order does not abrogate each party's individual duty to serve each other party with his or her own filings. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/12/19. (jg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/12/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jg) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying The Progressive Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate, by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (cjo) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-19-14382 Copies attached: Civil Cover Sheet, State Court Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5354220), filed by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (cjo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RUHE v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BETHANY RUHE | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Tuk |
| Represented By: | Joseph B. Tuk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Twilla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
