STARR v. MOFFITT
JIMMY STARR |
JOSHUA M. MOFFITT |
2:2019cv01482 |
November 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JIMMY STARR. (Eck, Mark) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JOSHUA M. MOFFITT. (Sapienza, Charles) |
Filing 9 ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than January 8, 2020. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb) |
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from JOSHUA M. MOFFITT ON 1/17/20. (sdp) |
Filing 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by JOSHUA M. MOFFITT Answer due from JOSHUA M. MOFFITT. (Martini, Mark) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles P. Sapienza, III on behalf of JOSHUA M. MOFFITT. (Sapienza, Charles) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION by JOSHUA M. MOFFITT. (Martini, Mark) |
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from JOSHUA M. MOFFITT on 1/17/2020 (sdp) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark A. Martini on behalf of JOSHUA M. MOFFITT. (Martini, Mark) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by JIMMY STARR. JOSHUA M. MOFFITT served on 11/27/2019, answer due 12/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Eck, Mark) |
Filing 3 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 11/15/2019. (jmb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JOSHUA M. MOFFITT (sdp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOSHUA M. MOFFITT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 315-5360006), filed by JIMMY STARR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: STARR v. MOFFITT | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JIMMY STARR | |
Represented By: | Mark A. Eck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOSHUA M. MOFFITT | |
Represented By: | Charles P. Sapienza, III |
Represented By: | Mark A. Martini |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.