UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $46,010.00 IN US CURRENCY et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $46,010.00 IN US CURRENCY and $3300 IN US CURRENCY |
| 2:2019cv01499 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WARRANT of for Arrest in Action in Rem issued (jd) |
| Filing 4 Request to Issue a Warrant for Arrest in Action in Rem by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Lew, David) |
| Filing 3 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/21/19. (jad)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $3300 IN US CURRENCY, $46,010.00 IN US CURRENCY, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
