PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNER et al
Plaintiff: JAMES A. PROVITT
Defendant: SERGEANT TANNER, NURSE BRENT, Physician Assistant DARLA COWDEN and SCI FAYETTE
Case Number: 2:2019cv01624
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Reed Eddy
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2020 Filing 7 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by JAMES A. PROVITT. Fee $7.48, receipt number 24668060764. (gmt)
December 31, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JAMES A. PROVITT. (cjo)
December 31, 2019 Filing 5 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by JAMES A. PROVITT. (cjo)
December 31, 2019 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against DARLA COWDEN, NURSE BRENT, SERGEANT TANNER ), filed by JAMES A. PROVITT. (cjo)
December 31, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/31/2019. (sms)
December 31, 2019 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint. Plaintiff is advised that no further action will be taken in this case until the initial partial fee of $7.48 is paid in full as more fully set forth in the attached Order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/31/2019. (sms)
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JAMES A. PROVITT. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization, #2 Prisoner Account Statement, #3 Complaint, #4 Consent to Trial by US Mag Judge or District Judge, #5 Envelope) (cjo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SERGEANT TANNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NURSE BRENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Physician Assistant DARLA COWDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCI FAYETTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES A. PROVITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?