LEE v. MCGARRY et al
L. COURTLAND LEE |
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES, MICHAEL W. LAMACH, HUGH GRANT, MELANIE L. HEALEY, STEPHEN F. ANGEL, VINCENT J. MORALES, GARY R. HEMINGER, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., JOHN V. FARACI, MARTIN H. RICHENHAGEN, VICTORIA F. HAYNES and MICHELE J. HOOPER |
2:2020cv00075 |
January 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Joy Flowers Conti |
William S Stickman |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Stay. Status Conference set for 6/1/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9B before Judge William S. Stickman. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/06/20. (eca) |
Filing 11 BRIEF in Opposition re #4 Motion to Stay filed by L. COURTLAND LEE. (Yates, Alfred) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #7 , #8 , and #9 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Mark P. Goodman, Elliot Greenfield, and Nathan S. Richards are admitted pro hac vice for PPG Industries, Inc. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/26/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) |
Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Nathan S. Richards to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5485526) by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Nathan S. Richards, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Richards, Nathan) |
Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Elliot Greenfield to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5485502) by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Elliot Greenfield, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Greenfield, Elliot) |
Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Mark P. Goodman to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5485454) by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mark P. Goodman, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Goodman, Mark) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER. Response to #4 Motion to Stay due by 3/4/2020; Response not to exceed ten pages. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/19/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) |
Filing 5 BRIEF in Support re #4 Motion to Stay filed by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Callahan, Colin) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Callahan, Colin) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.. (Callahan, Colin) |
Judge William S. Stickman added. Judge Joy Flowers Conti no longer assigned to case. (mao) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MARK C. KELLY, MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. (cjo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STEPHEN F. ANGEL, JAMES G. BERGES, JOHN V. FARACI, HUGH GRANT, VICTORIA F. HAYNES, MELANIE L. HEALEY, GARY R. HEMINGER, MICHELE J. HOOPER, MARK C. KELLY, MICHAEL W. LAMACH, MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, VINCENT J. MORALES, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., MARTIN H. RICHENHAGEN (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5430956), filed by L. COURTLAND LEE. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons PPG Industries, #11 Summons Mark C. Kelly, #12 Summons Michael H. McGarry) (cjo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.