MULLEN v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
| BARTLEY M. MULLEN, JR. |
| THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. |
| 2:2020cv00076 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| David S Cercone |
| Patricia L Dodge |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. answer due 4/22/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 3/13/2020. (mqe)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by BARTLEY M. MULLEN, JR. by THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.. (Vu, Minh) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Judge David S. Cercone no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/3/2020. (kly)
|
| Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge added. (mao) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Attorney Minh N. Vu to Appear Pro Hac Vice.. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/6/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Minh N. Vu to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5457643) by THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Minh Vu in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit A to Affidavit of Minh Vu in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #3 Proposed Order) (Vu, Minh) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BARTLEY M. MULLEN, JR. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. waiver sent on 1/23/2020, answer due 3/23/2020. (Carlson, R.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. (cjo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5431280), filed by BARTLEY M. MULLEN, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons The TJX Companies, Inc.) (cjo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MULLEN v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BARTLEY M. MULLEN, JR. | |
| Represented By: | R. Bruce Carlson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
