MARCHESE v. SAUL
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARCHESE
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Case Number: 2:2020cv00244
Filed: February 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Alan N Bloch
Referring Judge: William S Stickman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2020 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (WDPA) will be upgrading its current CM/ECF system to the Next Generation of CM/ECF (NextGen CM/ECF) on Monday, May 26, 2020. Complete information, including a checklist of actions regarding the WDPA NexGen CM/ECF implementation, can be found at #here . Currently, multiple attorneys within a firm may share a single PACER account. Shared PACER accounts cannot be used by WDPA e-filing attorneys once the WDPA NextGen CM/ECF system is implemented. Each attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account that will be linked to the e-filing account. If you have an upgraded PACER account, no action is required until after the WDPA NextGen CM/ECF upgrade on May 26, 2020. You have an upgraded PACER account if you (1) e-file in another NextGen court, or (2) created your PACER account after August 10, 2014. If neither of these are true, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account before you will be able to link your PACER account to your current WDPA CM/ECF account for your new NextGen CM/ECF account. Further informational notices will be sent later, but if you have questions about upgrading your PACER account, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6856. (Administrator, ) (ADI)
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Alan N. Bloch for all further proceedings. Judge William S. Stickman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/19/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca)
February 18, 2020 Filing 3 Errata re #2 Summons Issued, Reason for Correction: Summons for Attorney General was not issued because fields were not populated. (jv)
February 18, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL (Main Document is issued as to General Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to the Attorney General, #2 Summons issued as to the Regional Counsel, #3 Summons issued as to the U.S. Attorney for WDPA) (jv)
February 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5470475) filed by ANTHONY MARCHESE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Attorney General, #3 Summons as to General Counsel, #4 Summons as to Regional Counsel, #5 Summons as to U.S. Attorney) (jv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARCHESE v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARCHESE
Represented By: Gregory T. Kunkel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?