GREENFIELD v. PAYPAL, INC.
| DAVID WESLEY GREENFIELD |
| PAYPAL, INC. |
| 2:2020cv00289 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned case closed; that nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and that should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, either party may initiate the same in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized, including but not limited to enforcing settlement. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 3/17/2020. (av)
|
| Filing 5 STATUS REPORT Regarding Settlement (Joint) by PAYPAL, INC.. (McKenna, Daniel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. A joint status report regarding settlement is due by 3/18/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 3/6/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. PAYPAL, INC. answer due 3/18/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 3/6/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. ERROR: Proposed Order was made part of main document. CORRECTION: Attorney advised that in future proposed orders are to be made attachments to the main document. This message is for informational purposes only. (jd) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by PAYPAL, INC.. (McKenna, Daniel) |
| Judge Joy Flowers Conti no longer assigned to case. (mao) |
| Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (mao) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, case number GD-19-015525 with PLAINTIFF Copies attached: LOWER COURT COMPLAINT, EXHIBITS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5486506), filed by PAYPAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GREENFIELD v. PAYPAL, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID WESLEY GREENFIELD | |
| Represented By: | Gerald J. Schirato, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PAYPAL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel McKenna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
