MICLAUS et al v. INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION et al
GETA MICLAUS, KEVIN BYRNE and VIM BYRNE |
JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-10, WESTERN INVENTION SUBMISSION CORP., THOMAS FROST, P.A., UNIVERSAL PAYMENT CORPORATION, TECHNOSYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED CORP., ROBERT J. SUSA, INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION, THOMAS FROST, TECHNOSYSTEMS SERVICE CORP. and INTROMARK INCORPORATED |
2:2020cv00681 |
May 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Cathy Bissoon |
Patricia L Dodge |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/8/20. (jhi) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THOMAS FROST, PA, THOMAS FROST, INTROMARK INCORPORATED, INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION, JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-10, ROBERT J. SUSA, TECHNOSYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED CORP., TECHNOSYSTEMS SERVICE CORP., UNIVERSAL PAYMENT CORPORATION, WESTERN INVENTION SUBMISSION CORP. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5600518), filed by VIM BYRNE, GETA MICLAUS, KEVIN BYRNE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge added for pretrial proceedings as related to 18-1022. (jhi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.