TAYLOR v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY DA'S OFFICE et al
| SHAWN TAYLOR |
| WESTMORELAND COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTS and WARDEN, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON |
| 2:2020cv00741 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by SHAWN TAYLOR. FILER advised that the change of address has been made on above captioned matter only. If you wish to have address changed on other matters before this court, it is your responsibility to file such a notice at each case number. This NEF has been mailed to SHAWN TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (plp) |
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, the District Attorney on behalf of all Respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/11/2020. (bsc)
|
| Filing 8 Remark: A copy of the text-order at ECF No. 7 was mailed to Mr. Taylor on this date. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER - The Clerk of Court is ordered to add as a Respondent the Warden of Westmoreland County Prison because a prisoner's custodian is the proper respondent in a habeas corpus action, Rumsfield v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/26/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee was paid in full on 6/23/2020, receipt number 24668063214. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/25/2000. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SHAWN TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 prison certification, #2 inmate account statement) (plp) |
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668063214), filed by SHAWN TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
| Filing 3 CORRESPONDENCE to the Court as to SHAWN TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope) (jjg) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING: This action may not proceed unless the Petitioner either, 1) tenders to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court" the statutory filing fee in the amount of $5.00, or, 2) files a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that this petition is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion for IFP) (nll)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending disposition of filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Authorization, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
