BLUME HONEY WATER LLC v. BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC
Plaintiff: BLUME HONEY WATER LLC
Defendant: BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv00927
Filed: June 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Robert J Colville
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Erica W. Stump, Esquire to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/18/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
August 17, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Erica W. Stump to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-5840477) by BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Erica W. Stump) (Stump, Erica)
June 24, 2020 Filing 6 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BLUME HONEY WATER LLC. (Zegarelli, Gregg)
June 23, 2020 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 6/30/2020. (ma)
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jg)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 6/22/20. (jg)
June 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jg)
June 22, 2020 Filing 2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (ma)
June 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5701545), filed by BLUME HONEY WATER LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BLUME HONEY WATER LLC v. BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BLUME HONEY WATER LLC
Represented By: Gregg R. Zegarelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BYLT PERFORMANCE LLC
Represented By: Erica W Stump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?