GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION v. PET SMART, INC.
| GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION |
| PET SMART, INC. |
| 2:2020cv00935 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to PET SMART, INC. (elt) |
| Filing 10 PRAECIPE to Reissue Summons by GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Jacobs, Katie) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Peter J. Ennis terminated as counsel for GNC. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/10/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdk)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Fridrikh V. Shrayber on behalf of GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION. (Shrayber, Fridrikh) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ennis, Peter) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katie R. Jacobs on behalf of GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION. (Jacobs, Katie) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/6/20. (cjo)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (cjo) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying GNC Holdings, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION. (Ennis, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PET SMART, INC. (elt) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 7/1/2020. (elt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PET SMART, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5708010), filed by GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION v. PET SMART, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PET SMART, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Peter J. Ennis |
| Represented By: | Katie R. Jacobs |
| Represented By: | Fridrikh V. Shrayber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
