RAMBERT v. ESTOCK
ERIC X. RAMBERT |
LEE ESTOCK and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO |
2:2020cv00948 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
David S Cercone |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 OBJECTIONS to #3 Report and Recommendation by ERIC X. RAMBERT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that #2 Petitioner's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be granted solely for the purpose of filing his [2-1] Motion for Reconsideration, that the Motion for Reconsideration be construed as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive petition. To the extent that one is required, it is also recommended that a Certificate of Appealability be denied. Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 7/27/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 10, 2020. (kcb) |
Judge David S. Cercone is presiding and Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan is referred. (mao) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ERIC X. RAMBERT. Motion(s) referred to Lisa Pupo Lenihan. (ma) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/9/2020: #1 Proposed Motion for Reconsideration, #2 Envelope) (ma). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.