HASTON v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. et al
| 2:2020cv01008 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that the 20 Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed by Defendants Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. and Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC, is denied. See Memorandum Opinion for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 9/29/22. (lwp)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that 7 Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is denied without prejudice; the parties shall proceed to limited discovery on the thresh old issue of whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists; and, after this limited discovery is complete, Defendants may file a renewed motion to compel arbitration if warranted. See Memorandum Opinion for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 12/21/20. (kw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HASTON v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
