LASSALLE v. LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: WILFREDO LASSALLE
Defendant: ARIC PERMINTER, LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. and GINA MAHIN
Case Number: 2:2020cv01118
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: J Nicholas Ranjan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2020 Filing 7 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.. (Saul, Charles)
September 1, 2020 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Answer to Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 9/8/2020. (ma)
August 31, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by ARIC PERMINTER, LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC., GINA MAHIN. (Saul, Charles)
July 30, 2020 Filing 5 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC., GINA MAHIN, ARIC PERMINTER Answer due from LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. on 8/31/2020; GINA MAHIN on 8/31/2020; ARIC PERMINTER on 8/31/2020. (Saul, Charles)
July 28, 2020 Filing 4 Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Exchange of required Rule 26(a)(1) information due by 10/2/2020; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/2/2020; Stipulation Selecting ADR process due by 10/2/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/28/2020. (av)
July 24, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-20-007091 with Jury Demand Copies attached: State Court Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5788271), filed by LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC., GINA MAHIN, ARIC PERMINTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LASSALLE v. LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILFREDO LASSALLE
Represented By: Stephanie L Solomon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARIC PERMINTER
Represented By: Charles H. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LYNX TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.
Represented By: Charles H. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GINA MAHIN
Represented By: Charles H. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?