ANDREWS v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
| MICHAEL ANDREWS |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH |
| 2:2020cv01221 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Additional Defense by THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH. (Mannix, Paul) Modified on 10/15/2020 (jjg). |
Filing 10
ORDER. The Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference is hereby RESCHEDULED for 10/20/2020 at 04:00 PM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/13/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mannix, Paul) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH. (Mannix, Paul) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference is hereby RESCHEDULED for 10/20/2020 at 01:00 PM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/24/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren A. Melfa Catanzarite on behalf of THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH. (Melfa Catanzarite, Lauren) |
| Filing 5 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Answer due from THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH on 10/15/2020. (Mannix, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av) |
|
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/8/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Exchange of required Rule 26(a)(1) information due by 9/28/2020; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/28/2020; Stipulation Selecting ADR process due by 9/28/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 8/20/2020. (av)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD 20-05240. Copies attached: Notice to Defend, Complaint, Exhibits 1 - 4, Civil Cover Sheet (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5842815), filed by THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ANDREWS v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANDREWS | |
| Represented By: | J. Michael Baggett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | |
| Represented By: | Paul M. Mannix |
| Represented By: | Lauren A. Melfa Catanzarite |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
