PENNEY v. PATTERSON et al
| DANA PENNEY |
| MIKE DERISO, AGENT WOZNIKI, RONALD HOGUE, AGENT FARMER, SCOTT PATTERSON, AGENT BIRICOCCHI and NATHAN SMITH |
| 2:2020cv01251 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF. No. #1 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may submit another motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of the inmate account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of the complaint. If that resubmitted motion is granted, the case will be reopened. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may reopen the case by paying the $400.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 08/31/2020. (jmb)
|
| Filing 3 Remark: Additional exhibits received 8/27/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (elt) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by DANA PENNEY. (plp) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANA PENNEY. (Attachments: #1 Authorization, #2 proposed complaint lodged pending disposition of filing fee, #3 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
