JOHNSON v. WINDSOR
| ASIA JOHNSON |
| QUEEN ELIZABETH WINDSOR |
| 2:2020cv01295 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| David S Cercone |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 USCA Case Number 20-2966 for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by ASIA JOHNSON. USCA Case Manager Marianne (DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED AND CAN ONLY BE VIEWED BY COURT STAFF) (mb3) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ASIA JOHNSON. Motion for IFP Granted. Certificate of Appealability N/A. Court Reporter(s): N/A. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. The Transcript Purchase Order form will NOT be mailed to the parties. The form is available on the Court's internet site. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (ept) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against ELIZABETH WINDSOR, filed by ASIA JOHNSON. (ept) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER- the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk shall mark this case closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #2 ) dated September 4, 2020 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/24/2020. (jmc)
|
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ASIA JOHNSON respectfully recommending that the Court grant Johnson's application to proceed without prepayment of costs but that the Court dismiss her Complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 9/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 09/04/2020. A copy of this Notice and Report and Recommendation have been mailed to Plaintiff's address of record. (tjw) |
| Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer presiding in case. (nll) |
| Judge David S. Cercone presiding. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly referred. (nll) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ASIA JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. WINDSOR | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: QUEEN ELIZABETH WINDSOR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ASIA JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
