SCHIRRA v. MARAK et al
| JOHN C. SCHIRRA |
| THOMAS MARAK, WALMART INC., POINT SECURITY COMPANY INC and POINT SECURITY COMPANY INC. |
| 2:2020cv01305 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 BRIEF in Opposition re #13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by JOHN C. SCHIRRA. (Roesch, Max) |
Filing 16
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management set for 12/8/2020 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 5A before Judge Joy Flowers Conti. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 10/30/2020. ADR Stipulation and Rule 26f Report due by 11/13/2020. Details more fully stated in the order. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/9/20. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER ON MOTIONS PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/9/20. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge W. Scott Hardy recused. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 10/7/2020. (kas)
|
| Judge Joy Flowers Conti added. (mao) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Fed R Civ P.12(b)(6) by WALMART INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service) (McDonnell, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 Errata re 4 Amended Complaint by JOHN C. SCHIRRA. Reason for Correction: case number omitted. (Roesch, Max) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re 4 Amended Complaint. ERROR: case number missing from Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: refile it as an errata with the case number on document. (elt) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by THOMAS MARAK. THOMAS MARAK waiver sent on 9/16/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. (Norfleet, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Norfleet on behalf of THOMAS MARAK. (Norfleet, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank J. Lavery, Jr on behalf of THOMAS MARAK. (Lavery, Frank) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to W. Scott Hardy for all further proceedings. Judge Joy Flowers Conti no longer assigned to case. All previously scheduled deadlines and proceedings shall remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See order at 2:20-mc-1349. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 9/17/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cw)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (cjo) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick J. McDonnell on behalf of WALMART INC.. (McDonnell, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Max B. Roesch on behalf of JOHN C. SCHIRRA. (Roesch, Max) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to THOMAS MARAK, POINT SECURITY COMPANY INC, WALMART INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (elt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THOMAS MARAK, POINT SECURITY COMPANY INC, WALMART INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5881468), filed by JOHN C. SCHIRRA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
