SARWAR v. MOHAMMAD
SAIM SARWAR |
SALEEM MOHAMMAD |
2:2020cv01391 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
J Nicholas Ranjan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER. The Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED until further Order of Court. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 11/10/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion to Continue. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 11/10/2020. (av) |
Filing 18 Joint MOTION to Continue all Deadlines in Anticipation of Dismissal of Suit by SALEEM MOHAMMAD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Lacey, Alex) |
Filing 17 Errata re #16 Notice of Settlement by SAIM SARWAR. Reason for Correction: inadvertently filed. (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement by SAIM SARWAR (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by John Allen Roth on behalf of HOTEL AND STUFF INC.. (Roth, John) |
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 Response to Motion to Consolidate filed by HOTEL AND STUFF INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Order of Western District of Texas September 30 2020, #2 Exhibit 2 -- Sua Sponte Order Western District of Texas, #3 3 -- Sua Sponte Order of Northern District of New York) (Roth, John) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by SAIM SARWAR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/28/2020. SALEEM MOHAMMAD's response to #1 Complaint due by 11/10/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by SALEEM MOHAMMAD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Lacey, Alex) |
Filing 10 ORDER. Counsel for Plaintiff shall file a response to #9 Motion to Consolidate Cases on the docket of each civil action listed in the caption of this motion on or before November 5, 2020, including this civil action. If this action were to be consolidated in whole or in part, it would be consolidated at this docket number pursuant to the operating procedures of this Court, as it is the lowest docket number of the involved actions on the docket of this Division of the Court. Counsel who has filed the consolidation motion shall also file a notice on the docket of each case listed in the Caption of the motion stating specifically which parties He represents and which he does not, and in which actions and shall immediately enter a notice of appearance in the appropriate Action as to any and all parties such counsel will be representing. The Clerk shall file this Order on the docket of each of the actions listed in this Motion as notice to the presiding judicial officer in each such other action. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 10/22/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by HOTEL AND STUFF INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Consolidating Cases, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs Agreement with Expedia Websites) (Roth, John) |
Filing 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by SALEEM MOHAMMAD Answer due from SALEEM MOHAMMAD on 10/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Lacey, Alex) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alex M. Lacey on behalf of SALEEM MOHAMMAD. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Lacey, Alex) |
Filing 6 Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av) |
Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/6/2020. Stipulation Selecting ADR process due by 11/6/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/28/2020. (av) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by SAIM SARWAR. SALEEM MOHAMMAD served on 9/22/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. (Gillespie, Tristan) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SALEEM MOHAMMAD (jjg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SALEEM MOHAMMAD (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5913373), filed by SAIM SARWAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SARWAR v. MOHAMMAD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SAIM SARWAR | |
Represented By: | Tristan Wade Gillespie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SALEEM MOHAMMAD | |
Represented By: | Alex M. Lacey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.