SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
Petitioner: KEVIN R. SHAY
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN
Case Number: 2:2020cv01447
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Rusheen R. Pettit on behalf of THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Pettit, Rusheen)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re #11 , Correspondence from Petitioner wherein he requests this Court to order Judge Jill Rangos to recuse herself from Petitioner's criminal proceedings over which she is presiding in state court, which proceedings are also subject of the instant habeas petition. The Court DENIES Petitioner's request made in the correspondence which the Court is treating as in the nature of requesting injunctive relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/2/2020. (tmr)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this Order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be borne by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the Petitioner's request for a stay of these proceedings. The parties are allowed 14 days from this date to appeal this Order to a District Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72(C)(2). A copy of this Order has been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/20/2020. (et)
October 15, 2020 Filing 11 Remark: Correspondence to the Court from Petitioner (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma)
October 15, 2020 Filing 10 Additional EXHIBIT in Support of #8 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by KEVIN R. SHAY. (ma)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to File : Petitioner has filed a Motion for Leave to File Additional Exhibits, ECF No. 7. The Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is ORDERED to file ECF No. 7-1 as "An Additional Exhibit In Support of the Petition." Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/15/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (et)
October 6, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Additional Exhibits by KEVIN R. SHAY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (ma)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying as moot #2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. In the light of Petitioner having paid the filing fee, ECF No. 5, the instant motion is denied as moot. A copy of this order will be mailed to Petitioner at his address of record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/6/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (Kelly, Maureen)
October 2, 2020 Filing 8 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00, receipt number 24668065058), filed by KEVIN R. SHAY. (ma)
October 2, 2020 Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 24668065058 (ma)
September 30, 2020 Filing 4 BRIEF in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KEVIN R. SHAY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Envelope) (ma)
September 29, 2020 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by KEVIN R. SHAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma)
September 29, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KEVIN R. SHAY. (Attachments: #1 Records officer declaration, #2 Envelope) (ma)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 Remark: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus received with no filing fee or In Forma Pauperis motion (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Envelope) (ma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Represented By: Rusheen R. Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Rusheen R. Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN
Represented By: Rusheen R. Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEVIN R. SHAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?