MCGINNIS v. OBERLANDER et. al
Petitioner: FRANK D. MCGINNIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Case Number: 2:2020cv01525
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2020 Filing 14 ANSWER to Writ of Habeas Corpus Volume III re #12 Answer to Writ by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, OBERLANDER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 21-27, #2 Exhibit 28 Part 1, #3 Exhibit 28 Part 2, #4 Exhibit 29, #5 Exhibit 30-32, #6 Exhibit 33 Part 1, #7 Exhibit 33 Part 2, #8 Exhibit 34) (Wabby, Ronald)
December 10, 2020 Filing 13 ANSWER to Writ of Habeas Corpus Volume II re #12 Answer to Writ by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, OBERLANDER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6, #2 Exhibit 7-13, #3 Exhibit 14, #4 Exhibit 15, #5 Exhibit 16, #6 Exhibit 17, #7 Exhibit 18-19, #8 Exhibit 20) (Wabby, Ronald)
December 10, 2020 Filing 12 ANSWER to Writ of Habeas Corpus Volume I re #6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, OBERLANDER. (Wabby, Ronald)
December 10, 2020 Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, OBERLANDER. (Wabby, Ronald)
December 10, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald M. Wabby, Jr on behalf of ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, OBERLANDER. (Wabby, Ronald)
November 4, 2020 Filing 8 Remark: Service copies placed in USMS mailbox 11/4/2020. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (et)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be borne by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondent and the District Attorney shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. The parties are allowed 14 days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72(C)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/4/2020. (et)
November 3, 2020 Filing 9 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. (ept)
November 3, 2020 Filing 6 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (), filed by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. (elt)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/30/2020. A copy of this notice and Order have been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. (et)
October 30, 2020 Filing 4 Errata re #3 Errata by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. Reason for Correction: added missing page #16 to petition. (elt)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 Errata re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. Reason for Correction: attach appropriate document (Authorization) to Petition. (elt)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. (elt)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FRANK D. MCGINNIS. (Attachments: #1 Authorization) (elt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2020: #2 Petition, #3 Envelope) (elt). Modified on 10/20/2020 Attachments 2 and 3 removed from public view and refiled at #3 (elt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCGINNIS v. OBERLANDER et. al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FRANK D. MCGINNIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?