BRIZZI v. SEEGRID CORPORATION
BECKI BRIZZI |
SEEGRID CORPORATION |
2:2020cv01543 |
October 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Marilyn J Horan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER Telephonic Initial Case Management set for 1/6/2021 at 10:30 AM via Telephone Conference before Judge Marilyn J. Horan. Rule 26(f) report and ADR stipulation due on or before 12/30/2020. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 11/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (bjl) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by SEEGRID CORPORATION. (Tuite, Jaime) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by SEEGRID CORPORATION. (Tuite, Jaime) |
Filing 9 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by SEEGRID CORPORATION. (Tuite, Jaime) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon M. Peck on behalf of SEEGRID CORPORATION. (Peck, Brandon) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaime S. Tuite on behalf of SEEGRID CORPORATION. (Tuite, Jaime) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Consent to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option. ERROR: Document filed in wrong case. CORRECTION: Removed from public view. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by BECKI BRIZZI. SEEGRID CORPORATION served on 10/23/2020, answer due 11/13/2020. (Dion, Samuel) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SEEGRID CORPORATION (jv) |
Filing 4 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by BECKI BRIZZI (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Dion, Samuel) |
Filing 3 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jgb) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 10/14/2020. (jgb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SEEGRID CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5990386), filed by BECKI BRIZZI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BRIZZI v. SEEGRID CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SEEGRID CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Jaime S. Tuite |
Represented By: | Brandon M. Peck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BECKI BRIZZI | |
Represented By: | Samuel Dion |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.