PETTAWAY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
| WAYNE PETTAWAY |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2020cv01776 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER re #8 Petitioner's "Petition for Review", #9 Petitioner's "Petition for Review", and #11 the Order denying Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner states that the filing fee for this case has been sent to the Court. The Clerk has informed the Court that the filing fee was received but it has not yet been processed. Once it has been processed then the case will be reopened. No further action regarding the filing fee is required on Petitioner's part at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on January 6, 2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kcb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. #6 ) is DENIED. Should Petitioner desire to proceed with this action, he must submit the $5.00 filing fee within 20 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 01/06/2021. (jmb)
|
| Filing 13 Remark: Petition for Review Complaint received from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lar) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WAYNE PETTAWAY. (jv) |
| Filing 9 PETITION for Review by Wayne Pettaway (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
| Filing 8 PETITION for Review, filed by WAYNE PETTAWAY (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jjg) |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WAYNE PETTAWAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lar) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WAYNE PETTAWAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lar) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 the Petition for Review that was received and docketed on December 8, 2020. Petitioner states that he is "bringing forth a complaint for obstruction of justice" because his "account for filing fee was deliberately held in account office." It is unclear what Petitioner intends with this filing. This case was administratively closed on November 19, 2020 due to Petitioner's failure to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and Petitioner was told that the case would be reopened upon the receipt of the filing fee or if a submitted motion for IFP was granted. See ECF No. 2. It appears that Petitioner is saying that the Inmate Account Office will not send in the filing fee for this case. The Court has never had an issue with the DOC withholding payments for filing fees in cases. If Petitioner believes that the Inmate Account Officer at his place of confinement is doing so then he should provide him/her with a copy of this order. If Petitioner still believes that the filing fee is being withheld then he may submit a motion for IFP with a copy of his prisoner account statement for the previous 6 months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on December 10, 2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kcb)
|
| Filing 4 Remark: Petition for Review received from Petitioner. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ept) |
| Filing 3 Remark: On this date, a copy of #2 Order and the ECF Filing receipt were mailed to: WAYNE PETTAWAY; HM-1581; SCI Albion; 10745 Route 18; Albion, PA 16475-0001. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk is to mark this CASE CLOSED. Petitioner may submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of the inmate account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of his Petition. If that motion is granted, the case will be reopened. Petitioner may also reopen this case by paying the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner is allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a District Judge pursuant to Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on November 19, 2020. (kcb)
|
| Filing 1 Remark: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus received with no filing fee or IFP Motion. (Attachments: #1 USCA Order) (lar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PETTAWAY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WAYNE PETTAWAY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
