MIMS v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE
| JAMES MIMS |
| CITY OF NEW CASTLE |
| 2:2020cv01814 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Christy Criswell Wiegand |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JAMES MIMS. CITY OF NEW CASTLE waiver sent on 11/24/2020, answer due 1/25/2021. (Olson, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 8
Errata re #6 Notice of Appearance by CITY OF NEW CASTLE. Reason for Correction: Case Number Unreadable. (Randle, Morgan)
|
|
Filing 7
Errata re #5 Notice of Appearance by CITY OF NEW CASTLE. Reason for Correction: Case Number Unreadable. (Dunlop, Scott)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Notice of Appearance, #5 Notice of Appearance. ERROR: Case number unreadable. CORRECTION: Refile using the Errata event with corrected document attached. (ma)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan M. J. Randle on behalf of CITY OF NEW CASTLE. (Randle, Morgan)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott G. Dunlop on behalf of CITY OF NEW CASTLE. (Dunlop, Scott)
|
|
Filing 4
AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 11/23/. (jmm)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 11/23/2020. (jmm)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jmm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CITY OF NEW CASTLE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-6092120), filed by JAMES MIMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MIMS v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF NEW CASTLE | |
| Represented By: | Scott G. Dunlop |
| Represented By: | Morgan M. J. Randle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES MIMS | |
| Represented By: | Bradley G. Olson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
