WHITEFORD v. EQUIFAX INC. et al
JOSEPH B. WHITEFORD |
DOES 1-10, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC., TRANS UNION LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and EQUIFAX INC. |
2:2021cv00094 |
January 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
William S Stickman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 3/23/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 3/30/2021. Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge William S. Stickman. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/02/21. A copy of this Order will be mailed to Plaintiff this day, 03/02/21. (eca) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative and Other Defenses by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 13 Disclosure Statement identifying Equifax Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative and Other Defenses by EQUIFAX INC.. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by EQUIFAX INC.. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement identifying Experian PLC as corporate parent or other affiliate, by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC.. (Spangenberg, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC.. (Spangenberg, Andrew) |
Filing 8 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, And Affirmative Defenses by TRANS UNION LLC. (Irlbeck, Cayla) |
Filing 7 Disclosure Statement identifying TransUnion, TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by TRANS UNION LLC. (Irlbeck, Cayla) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Cayla M. Irlbeck to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Cayla M. Irlbeck is admitted pro hac vice on behalf of Trans Union LLC. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/18/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) |
Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Cayla M. Irlbeck to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6348187) by TRANS UNION LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Of Cayla M. Irlbeck In Support Of Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Proposed Order) (Irlbeck, Cayla) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed EQUIFAX INC. served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC. served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed TRANS UNION LLC served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC., TRANS UNION LLC. (nll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EQUIFAX INC., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTINS, INC., TRANS UNION LLC (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number 24668066988), filed by JOSEPH B. WHITEFORD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Receipt, #8 Envelope) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.