MORRISON v. DAVE & BUSTERS, INC.
| ANDREA MORRISON |
| DAVE & BUSTERS, INC. |
| 2:2021cv00219 |
| February 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #6 Joint Motion to Stay. It is hereby ORDERED that the case is STAYED pending arbitration pursuant to the Mutual Arbitration Agreement. Counsel is directed to file a Joint Status Report within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the arbitration award, or other disposition of the matter. It is further ORDERED that this matter is hereby administratively CLOSED for the period of the stay. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/2/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Stay re #1 Complaint Pending Arbitration by DAVE & BUSTERS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Michalski, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michalski on behalf of DAVE & BUSTERS, INC.. (Michalski, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/18/21. (jad)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVE & BUSTERS, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6339727), filed by ANDREA MORRISON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MORRISON v. DAVE & BUSTERS, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DAVE & BUSTERS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michalski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANDREA MORRISON | |
| Represented By: | David B. Spear |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
