BLOOM v. UNUM GROUP
| ELANA J. BLOOM |
| UNUM GROUP |
| 2:2021cv00309 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| William S Stickman |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Kenneth Benson is appointed as mediator. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 04/27/21. (eca)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by ELANA J. BLOOM. (Salemme, James) |
|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 04/28/21; Joinder of Parties due 04/28/21; Exchange of initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) due by 04/27/21; Expert Reports by 10/14/21; Rebuttal Reports by 11/29/21; Discovery ends 12/29/21; Telephonic Post-Discovery Status Conference set for 01/10/22 at 10:00 AM; Call parameters outlined herein; Fee records due by the 28th of each month; First disclosure due by 05/28/21; Summary Judgment due by 01/28/22; Response to Summary Judgment due by 02/28/22; Reply brief due by 03/14/22; Page limitations outlined herein. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 04/14/21. (eca)
|
| Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William S. Stickman: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 4/14/2021. (Court Reporter: None) (eca) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Henefer, E.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James Andrew Salemme on behalf of ELANA J. BLOOM. (Salemme, James) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 4/1/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 4/8/2021. Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge William S. Stickman. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/10/21. (eca)
|
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses; and Certificate of Service by UNUM GROUP. (Henefer, E.) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by UNUM GROUP. (Henefer, E.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ALLEGHEY COUNTY, case number GD-21-000679 with PLAINTIFF Copies attached: LOWER COURT COMPLAINT, EXHIBITS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6396530), filed by UNUM GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BLOOM v. UNUM GROUP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ELANA J. BLOOM | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Cassidy |
| Represented By: | James Andrew Salemme |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNUM GROUP | |
| Represented By: | E. Thomas Henefer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
