BIERNESSER et al v. JACKSON et al
JAMES BIERNESSER and DOUGLAS HOLCOMB |
JOHN/JANE DOES I-X, CHIEF ISAAC DANIELE, SHARON JACKSON and THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK |
2:2021cv00543 |
April 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Mark R Hornak |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas W. King, III on behalf of ISAAC DANIELE, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK. (King, Thomas) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan P. Shuber on behalf of ISAAC DANIELE, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK. (Shuber, Jordan) |
Filing 14 ORDER REOPENING CASE. The stay in this matter is hereby LIFTED and this action is hereby REOPENED on the Court's docket. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 6/11/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT #12 First Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that the Borough of North Braddock and Isaac Daniele shall file their response to the Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF Doc. #1 ) on or before June 30, 2021, and it is further ORDERED that this matter is STAYED as to all parties until June 9, 2021. And it is further ORDERED that this matter is hereby administratively CLOSED for the period of the stay. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 5/25/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by DOUGLAS HOLCOMB, JAMES BIERNESSER and for a Stay of Proceedings until June 9. 2021 by ISAAC DANIELE, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bacharach, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John A. Bacharach on behalf of ISAAC DANIELE, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK. (Bacharach, John) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #7 Summons/Returned Returned Executed, #8 Summons/Returned Returned Executed. ERROR: Wrong date used for service date which generated incorrect answer due date. CORRECTION: Removed from public view both entries since they were filed correctly at #10 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed ISAAC DANIELE served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021; THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021.. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed ISAAC DANIELE served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021; THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned for The Borough of North Braddock) (jv) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAMES BIERNESSER, DOUGLAS HOLCOMB (York, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by JAMES BIERNESSER, DOUGLAS HOLCOMB. ISAAC DANIELE served on 4/30/2021, answer due 5/21/2021. (York, David) Modified on 5/17/2021 to remove from public view since court filed correctly at #10 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed ISAAC DANIELE served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021; THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021.(jv). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by JAMES BIERNESSER, DOUGLAS HOLCOMB. THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK served on 4/30/2021, answer due 5/21/2021. (York, David) Modified on 5/17/2021 to remove from public view since court filed correctly at #10 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed ISAAC DANIELE served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021; THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021. (jv). |
Filing 6 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/26/21. (jad) |
Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ISAAC DANIELE (main document), THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to The Borough of North Braddock) (jv) |
Filing 2 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by JAMES BIERNESSER, DOUGLAS HOLCOMB (Attachments: #1 Summons Defendant Daniele, #2 Summons Defendant North Braddock) (York, David) Modified on 4/26/2021 correct double description for attachment (jv). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ISAAC DANIELE, JOHN/JANE DOES I-X, SHARON JACKSON, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH BRADDOCK (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6476942), filed by JAMES BIERNESSER, DOUGLAS HOLCOMB. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.