STRINGER v. HENDERSON et al
| ROBERT STRINGER |
| C/O DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. GUMBAREVIC, JOHN DOE, C/O BENNETT and C/O HENDERSON |
| 2:2021cv00547 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cr |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by BENNETT, DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, GUMBAREVIC, HENDERSON. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 7/9/2021, the Defendants shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. The Court notes that Plaintiff has already submitted an election form. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/2/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cmc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's Response to Motion or Amended Complaint due by 7/9/2021; Defendants' Reply due by 7/23/2021, as more fully set forth in the attached Order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/2/2021. (cmc)
|
|
Filing 8
BRIEF in Support re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BENNETT, DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, GUMBAREVIC, HENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by BENNETT, DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, GUMBAREVIC, HENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ROBERT STRINGER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer by the Corrections Defendants. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Corrections Defendants have until 5/30/2021 to respond to the Complaint in this matter. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/3/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cmc)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BENNETT, DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, GUMBAREVIC, HENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of DAY. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 4/27/2021. (cmc)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greene County, case number AD-59-2021 with Jury Demand. Copies attached: State Court Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6478033), filed by ROBERT GILMORE, BENNETT, GUMBAREVIC, HENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ma)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
