SWINT et al v. BUNDY et al
| JAMES STANLEY DEAN and ROBERT JAMES SWINT |
| J.D. POWER + ASSOCIATES, JOHN W. DEAN, LEGACY CLINIC, JOHN WAYNE GACY, THEODORE ROBERT BUNDY, STANLEY CUP and ROBERT S. MUELLER |
| 2:2021cv00619 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| W Scott Hardy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER indicating that, Plaintiffs having failed to submit to the Court a Filing Fee of $402.00 or a Properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis by 5/28/2021 as required by the Court's Order entered on 5/13/2021 (Docket No. #2 ), this matter is DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court is to mark this CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 6/11/2021. (kas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER indicating that the plaintiffs, having forwarded to the Court a Complaint without a filing fee or the forms required to proceed In forma pauperis in a civil case, must either pay the filing fee or submit all necessary forms for a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by 5/28/2021 or the case will be closed. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 5/13/2021. (kas)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT RECEIVED, no IFP, no Filing Fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
