ROSE et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
| CLARK ROSE and LORA JEAN ROSE |
| STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION trading and doing business as STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS |
| 2:2021cv00649 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Remark:DETAILS: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Western has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:21-cv-10955, filed 06/08/2021. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (sdp) |
| Case electronically transferred to District of MASSACHUSETTS. (jd) |
| Filing 11 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order received (jd) |
| Filing 10 Conditional Transfer Order received from the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation. (jd) |
Filing 9
Order vacating #5 Case Management Order. The deadlines and Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 6/28/2021 at 11:30 a.m. are hereby CONTINUED until further Order of Court. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 5/24/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond by HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION. (Rosenberger, Jason) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av) |
| Filing 6 IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING TELEPHONE PROCEEDINGS. (av) |
|
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/18/2021; Stipulation Selecting ADR process due by 6/18/2021; Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2021 at 11:30 a.m. before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 5/18/2021. (av)
|
| Filing 4 Errata re #1 Notice of Removal,, by HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION. Reason for Correction: Exhibit G - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal missing. (Passodelis, Constantine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason A. Rosenberger on behalf of HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION. (Rosenberger, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION. (Passodelis, Constantine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ALLEGHENY COUNTY, case number GD-20-007340 with BOTH Copies attached: Notice to Defend, Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, Praecipe of Appearaance, Lower Court Complaint, Exhibits (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6514815), filed by STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal,,. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 5/24/2021. (jd) Modified on 5/25/2021 (jd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
