SIMMONS v. DOLLAR BANK FSB et al
| LANDRY SIMMONS, JR. |
| DOLLAR BANK FSB and DOES 1 THROUGH 5 |
| 2:2021cv01039 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Banks and Banking |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by DOLLAR BANK FSB. (O'Keefe, John) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Andrew J. Demko to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/13/2021. (et)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for attorney Andrew J. Demko to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6702482) by DOLLAR BANK FSB. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Andrew J. Demko, #2 Proposed Order) (Demko, Andrew) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer filed by DOLLAR BANK FSB; Defendant Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank, shall Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 8, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/1/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (ndf)
|
| Filing 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by DOLLAR BANK FSB Answer due from DOLLAR BANK FSB on 11/8/2021. (O'Keefe, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. O'Keefe, Jr on behalf of DOLLAR BANK FSB. (O'Keefe, John) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Sherief Morsy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 8/23/2021. (et)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Sherief Morsy to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6670003), by LANDRY SIMMONS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order) (Morsy, Sherief) Modified text on 8/24/2021. (ndf) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Richard D. McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 8/19/2021. (et)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by LANDRY SIMMONS, JR. DOLLAR BANK FSB served on 8/16/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (Kusel, Elaine) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Richard D. McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6664611) by LANDRY SIMMONS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order) (McCune, Richard) |
|
Filing 3
As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any motion to dismiss to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, motions to dismiss must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Motions to dismiss that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 8/10/2021. (et)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DOLLAR BANK FSB (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 THROUGH 5, DOLLAR BANK FSB (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6642764), filed by LANDRY SIMMONS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
