HICKS v. GARRITY et al
Plaintiff: WOODROW J. HICKS
Defendant: STACY GARRITY and JOHN DOE
Case Number: 2:2021cv01067
Filed: August 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2021 Filing 11 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by WOODROW J. HICKS. Fee $118.17, receipt number 24668071426. (gmt)
September 30, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 9 Order to Show Cause, filed by WOODROW J. HICKS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Envelope) (ijh)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute insofar as he has failed to comply with the Court's Order dated August 16, 2021, which directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $114.77 by September 16, 2021. As stated in that Order, Plaintiff was warned that this case could be dismissed for his failure to prosecute if he authorized payments but failed to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days. As of today, the Court has received Plaintiff's authorization form but has yet to receive an initial partial payment. This is Plaintiff's final warning. No later than October 4, 2021, Plaintiff shall either submit the initial partial payment of $114.77 or he should otherwise show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to do so. Failure to do either could result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on September 20, 2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kcb)
September 10, 2021 Filing 8 COMPLAINT against STACY GARRITY, JOHN DOE ), filed by WOODROW J. HICKS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Envelope) (ijh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 7 Errata on the #6 Standing Practice Order for Pro Se Civil Rights Cases Reason for Correction: The wrong document was attached. This entry corrects that error. (jmb)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 08/27/2021. (jmb) Document removed from public view and re-filed as an errata at #7 Modified text on 8/30/2021. (ijh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 5 Remark: Certified copies of the (ECF No. #3 ) Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and of (ECF No. #4 ) Plaintiff's Authorization were both mailed to the Inmate Account Officer at S.C.I. Houtzdale. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
August 26, 2021 Filing 4 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by WOODROW J. HICKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ijh)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire $350.00 filing fee. However, Plaintiff shall pay $114.77 as an initial partial filing fee as provided by 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, the initial partial filing fee to the Clerk of Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after the payment of the initial partial filing fee, each time a deposit is made to Plaintiff's account, the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall set aside the deposit immediately before any disbursement is made by Plaintiff, and when the amount in Plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, the agency shall forward payments to this Court equaling 20% of the preceding month's income credited to his account until the filing fee for this case is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is binding on the superintendent/warden of any jail or correctional facility where Plaintiff is incarcerated until the filing fee is paid in full in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enclose with this Order an authorization form which Plaintiff shall complete and return to the Court within TEN (10) DAYS of entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the Inmate Account Officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement if and once Plaintiff has returned his authorization form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if Plaintiff fails to return the authorization form within TEN (10) DAYS from the date of this Order or if Plaintiff authorizes payments and the initial partial filing fee is not received within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court docket the Complaint and any attachments thereto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on August 16, 2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Authorization Form) (kcb)
August 12, 2021 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WOODROW J. HICKS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ijh)
August 12, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WOODROW J. HICKS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Envelope) (ijh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HICKS v. GARRITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WOODROW J. HICKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STACY GARRITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?