LIFEMD, INC et al v. LAMARCO et al
| LIFEMD, INC, JUSTIN SCHREIBER and STEFAN GALLUPPI |
| CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC doing business as CULPER RESEARCH and JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 |
| 2:2021cv01273 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| William S Stickman |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by LIFEMD, INC. (Lucas, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (DE Leeuw, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
BRIEF in Opposition re #6 Motion to Dismiss filed by STEFAN GALLUPPI. (Lucas, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re #6 Motion to Dismiss: Response and Brief Brief in Opposition, not to exceed twenty pages, due by 11/03/2021; Reply brief, not to exceed fifteen pages, due by 11/10/2021. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 10/13/2021. (rgm)
|
|
Filing 7
BRIEF in Support re #6 Motion to Dismiss - Memorandum of Law In Support Of Defendants Christian Matthew Lamarco and Shadyside Partners, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (DE Leeuw, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal, by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (DE Leeuw, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #3 and #4 Motions for Michael de Leeuw and Tamar Wise to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys Michael de Leeuw and Tamar Wise are admitted pro hac vice on behalf of Christian Matthew Lamarco and Shadyside Partners, LLC. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 10/01/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for attorney Tamar Wise to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6734243) by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Proposed Order) (Wise, Tamar)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for attorney Michael de Leeuw to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6734130) by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Proposed Order) (DE Leeuw, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (Wenger, Rachel)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement as to SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC only within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 10/1/2021. (jv)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-21-011364 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6724124), filed by CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A) (jv)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
