CAMPANELLA v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
| PIETRO CAMPANELLA |
| THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER, JOHN IRVIN, GREGORY F. PASHKE, WILLIAM F. STROME, ROGER W. THILGEN, BONNIE K. WACHTEL and PAUL A. CAMUTI |
| 2:2021cv01302 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Christy Criswell Wiegand |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER. Plaintiff's #11 Motion to Withdraw #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is HEREBY GRANTED. As such, Plaintiff's #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is HEREBY DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 11/12/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmm)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Withdraw #9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction as Moot by PIETRO CAMPANELLA. (Yates, Alfred) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by PIETRO CAMPANELLA. (Yates, Alfred) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by PIETRO CAMPANELLA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Yates, Alfred) |
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants, filed by PIETRO CAMPANELLA. (Yates, Alfred) |
| Filing 7 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jmm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 10/6/2021. (jmm)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jmm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to another member of the court for all further proceedings. Judge David S. Cercone no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 10/5/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (mwm)
|
| Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand added. (mao) |
| Judge David S. Cercone added. (sms) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak recused. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 9/30/21. (bdb)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PAUL A. CAMUTI, JOHN HARTNER, JOHN IRVIN, GREGORY F. PASHKE, S. KENT ROCKWELL, WILLIAM F. STROME, THE EXONE COMPANY, ROGER W. THILGEN, BONNIE K. WACHTEL (sdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PAUL A. CAMUTI, JOHN HARTNER, JOHN IRVIN, GREGORY F. PASHKE, S. KENT ROCKWELL, WILLIAM F. STROME, THE EXONE COMPANY, ROGER W. THILGEN, BONNIE K. WACHTEL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6731381), filed by PIETRO CAMPANELLA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
