RYAN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
| JAMES RYAN |
| STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES, DAVID E. SCHLOSSER, JR., JIMMI SUE SMITH, JAMES E. ROHR, VICKY A. BAILEY, PHILIP G. BEHRMAN, KENNETH M. BURKE, A. BRAY CARY, JR., MARGARET K. DORMAN, LEE T. TODD, JR., CHRISTINE J. TORETTI, DANIEL J. RICE, IV, ANITA POWERS, THOMAS F. KARAM, NORMAN J. SZYDLOWSKI, ROBERT F. VAGT and EQT CORPORATION |
| 2:2021cv01445 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert J Colville |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY indicating that: 1. The Ryan Action is hereby stayed through the earlier of (1) the entry of an order of this Court resolving any summary judgment motion filed in the Putative Securities Class Action (C.A. 19-754), or (2) either of the Parties having given notice that they no longer consent to the voluntary stay of the Ryan Action. 2. Within 10 days after the earlier of (1) the entry of an order of this Court resolving any summary judgment motion filed in the Putative Securities Class Action, or (2) either of the Parties to this Stipulation having given notice that they no longer consent to the voluntary stay of the Ryan Action, the Parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed scheduling order governing further proceedings in this action. 3. In the event the parties to the Putative Securities Class Action or to any related derivative action that is purportedly filed on behalf of EQT arising from substantially similar allegations and asserting substantially similar claims as the Ryan Action, whether filed in this Court or in another court (a "Related Derivative Action"), agree to attend either a court-ordered settlement conference or party-scheduled mediation, Defendants agree to request that Plaintiff be allowed to participate in the settlement conference or mediation. 4. Defendants shall promptly notify Plaintiff of any Related Derivative Actions that are filed during the stay and shall, upon request by Plaintiff, inform Plaintiff of whether any such Related Derivative Action is stayed and the duration of that stay. 5. For the avoidance of doubt, Defendants' obligation to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is stayed pursuant to this Stipulation and Order, and the Parties shall address Defendants response deadline in the proposed scheduling order contemplated in Paragraph 2, above. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 12/3/21. (jg)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION re #6 Complaint,, and [Proposed] Order to Stay by VICKY A. BAILEY, PHILIP G. BEHRMAN, KENNETH M. BURKE, A. BRAY CARY, JR, MARGARET K. DORMAN, EQT CORPORATION, THOMAS F. KARAM, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES, ANITA POWERS, DANIEL J. RICE, IV, JAMES E. ROHR, DAVID E. SCHLOSSER, JR, STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, JIMMI SUE SMITH, NORMAN J. SZYDLOWSKI, LEE T. TODD, JR, CHRISTINE J. TORETTI, ROBERT F. VAGT. (Rockney, James) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #8 Stipulation,. ERROR: Proposed Order was made part of main document. CORRECTION: Attorney advised that in future proposed orders are to be made attachments to the main document. This message is for informational purposes only. (elt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Stipulation that: 1. Defendants agree to accept service of the Complaint on 11/10/21. Defendants do not waive any objections to the jurisdiction or venue of this Court or any other defenses; 2. Defendants shall move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint 60 days of the Court's entry of this Stipulation and Proposed Order as an order ofthe Court (1/10/22); 3. If Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiff shall file and serve any opposition to such motion 60 days of the filing of such motion; 4. Defendants shall file and serve any reply in further support of any motion to dismiss the Complaint within 30 days after the filing of any such opposition. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 11/10/21. (jg)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order by VICKY A. BAILEY, PHILIP G. BEHRMAN, KENNETH M. BURKE, A. BRAY CARY, JR, MARGARET K. DORMAN, EQT CORPORATION, THOMAS F. KARAM, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES, ANITA POWERS, DANIEL J. RICE, IV, JAMES E. ROHR, DAVID E. SCHLOSSER, JR, STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, JIMMI SUE SMITH, NORMAN J. SZYDLOWSKI, LEE T. TODD, JR, CHRISTINE J. TORETTI, ROBERT F. VAGT. (Rockney, James) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James L. Rockney on behalf of VICKY A. BAILEY, PHILIP G. BEHRMAN, KENNETH M. BURKE, A. BRAY CARY, JR, MARGARET K. DORMAN, EQT CORPORATION, THOMAS F. KARAM, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES, ANITA POWERS, DANIEL J. RICE, IV, JAMES E. ROHR, DAVID E. SCHLOSSER, JR, STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, JIMMI SUE SMITH, NORMAN J. SZYDLOWSKI, LEE T. TODD, JR, CHRISTINE J. TORETTI, ROBERT F. VAGT. (Rockney, James) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion to File Complaint Under Seal. Decision to Unseal Document deferred. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 10/25/21. (jg)
|
| Filing 6 REDACTED COMPLAINT against VICKY A. BAILEY, PHILIP G. BEHRMAN, KENNETH M. BURKE, A. BRAY CARY, JR, MARGARET K. DORMAN, THOMAS F. KARAM, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES, ANITA POWERS, DANIEL J. RICE, IV, JAMES E. ROHR, DAVID E. SCHLOSSER, JR, STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, JIMMI SUE SMITH, NORMAN J. SZYDLOWSKI, LEE T. TODD, JR, CHRISTINE J. TORETTI, ROBERT F. VAGT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number 24668071695), filed by JAMES RYAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D - Redacted, #5 Exhibit E - Redacted, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) Modified text on 10/25/2021. (elt) |
| Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jg) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 10/22/21. (jg)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for LEAVE TO FILE THE VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL by JAMES RYAN. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Receipt) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
