HOPKINS v. TICE et al
| JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS |
| MR. ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY |
| 2:2021cv01670 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Remark: Remark: Service copies were forwarded to the U.S. Marshal. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the (ECF. No. #1 ) Petition for Writ of Habeas and the (ECF No. #3 ) Attachment to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon the respondents, Eric Tice, the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania as well as the District Attorney of Allegheny County, with costs to be advanced by the United States; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The District Attorney shall address both the merits of the petition and exhaustion of state court remedies. The answer shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records, including all relevant transcripts, all briefs filed by petitioner, and all written opinions of the courts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days will constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/16/2021. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 3
Attachment to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lyk)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS. Upon review of each claim in the Petition, the Court notes that the Petitioner writes "please see attachment." Petitioner, however, is hereby advised that no attachments were received with his 14-page Petition. Accordingly, no later than January 5, 2022, Petitioner is to submit his attachments, which presumably list his claims and sets forth the supporting facts for each of them. The Court cannot review the Petition until this information is received. If said information is not received by January 5, 2022, or if Petitioner does not request additional time to submit this information, then this case will be dismissed for Petitioner's failure to prosecute. Petitioner should take care to label this information with his case number and with the title "Attachment to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" to ensure that it gets filed in the correct case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on December 6, 2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kcb)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668072082), filed by JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (lyk) No attachment included. Modified text on 11/18/2021. (lyk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
