MALARIK v. BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ET AL
| JAMES M. WHITEY BULGE MALARIK and JAMES M WHITEY BULGER MALARIK |
| WARDEN OF BEAVER COUNTY JAIL and BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE |
| 2:2021cv01683 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING, indicating that, for reasons more fullly stated within, the Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case as the Petition has been received without a filing fee or the forms required to proceed in forma pauperis. Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to provide Petitioner with the following: (1) a 2241 form to be used by Petitioner if he is challenging his pre-trial detention; (2) a Civil Rights Complaint form to be used by Petitioner if he is seeking to assert claims for violations of his constitutional rights; and (3) an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/29/2021. (bsc)
|
| Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
