WEBB v. CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
COURTNEY R. WEBB |
CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT |
2:2021cv01739 |
November 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 Amended Complaint by CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cavrich, Joseph) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT answer due 1/31/2022, filed by COURTNEY R. WEBB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Kukoyi, Lanre) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint by COURTNEY R. WEBB. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kukoyi, Lanre) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend. ERROR: Signature on document and filer do not match. CORRECTION: Attorney advised of signature requirements. Attorney to resubmit the document using the Errata event. (jd) |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lanre Kukoyi on behalf of COURTNEY R. WEBB. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Kukoyi, Lanre) |
Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Cavrich, Joseph) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (cjo) |
![]() |
Filing 3 BRIEF in Support re #2 Motion for More Definite Statement filed by CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Cavrich, Joseph) |
Filing 2 MOTION for More Definite Statement by CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charge of Discrimination, #2 Proposed Order) (Cavrich, Joseph) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny county, case number GD 21-9561 with jury demand Copies attached: state court record (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6828344), filed by CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-COMPLAINT, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WEBB v. CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: COURTNEY R. WEBB | |
Represented By: | Olanrewaju Kukoyi |
Represented By: | Lanre Kukoyi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | |
Represented By: | Joseph W. Cavrich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.