BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA (WASH. CO.) et al
| GREGORY G. BROWN |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PA (WASH. CO.), MARTIQUA SLOAN and TODD FOREMAN |
| 2:2022cv00087 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM and ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. This action may not proceed unless the Plaintiff either, 1) tenders to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court" the fee of $402.00 (statutory filing fee of $350.00, plus a $52.00 administrative fee); or, 2) submits a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, including "an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case administratively CLOSED. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/24/2022. (cmc) |
| Filing 2 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/18/2022. (bsc) |
| Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ijh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
