Morris v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al
Cynthia Morris |
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. |
2:2022cv00098 |
January 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
Filing 16 TOLLING AGREEMENT. (sms) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 2:21-cv-02305. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Western District of Pennsylvania. Electronic Records Transferred. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Koninklijke Philips NV, Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Shana E. Scarlett* *Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP* *715 Hearst Ave., Suite 202* *Berkeley, CA 94710*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Koninklijke Philips NV, Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC by Cynthia Morris. Attorney Scarlett, Shana E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9974271) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scarlett, Shana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.