JENNISON CORPORATION v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: JENNISON CORPORATION
Defendant: CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2022cv00100
Filed: January 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action. Should further proceedings be required, either party may file a motion to re-open, and this case will proceed as if this order had not been entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when this case is stayed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 03/14/2022. (jmb)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. #6 ) is GRANTED. This action will be stayed until further Order of this Court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to administratively close the case until further order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 03/14/2022. (jmb)
February 23, 2022 Filing 11 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to #6 Motion to Stay, filed by CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gill, Trisha)
February 9, 2022 Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JENNISON CORPORATION. (Sandow, Richard)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING the (ECF No. #7 ) Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint shall be either 15 days from any order denying the stay or 15 days from the date the stay is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 02/08/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
February 7, 2022 Filing 8 Addendum by JENNISON CORPORATION in Support of #6 Motion to Stay. (Spontak, Edward)
February 7, 2022 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Gill, Trisha)
February 7, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Stay by JENNISON CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) (Sandow, Richard)
January 21, 2022 Filing 5 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Gill, Trisha)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than February 10, 2022. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Any party who has filed a Consent to Trial by a Magistrate Judge or District Judge form does not need to refile it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 01/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 01/20/2022. (jmb)
January 20, 2022 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Cincinnati Financial Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate, by CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Gill, Trisha)
January 20, 2022 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 1/27/2022. (lyk)
January 18, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD 22-000331 Copies attached: Complaint, Service, Notice of Filing (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6904881), filed by CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (lyk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JENNISON CORPORATION v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JENNISON CORPORATION
Represented By: Edward C. Spontak
Represented By: Richard B. Sandow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Trisha A. Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?