SCOTT v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: DELGARDO SCOTT
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION and JOHN DOE
Case Number: 2:2022cv00148
Filed: January 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: David S Cercone
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER implementing Rule502(d) at the Joint Request of the Parties. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/24/2022. (kak)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Harry Paras, Esquire is appointed as the mediator. Mediation shall be conducted by 6/3/2022. The report of mediator shall be electronically filed within 7 days of the mediation conference. G. Christopher Apessos, Esquire is designated as lead counsel. HARRY PARAS is added. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/24/2022. (kak)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/31/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 5/31/2022. Discovery due by 8/15/2022. A status conference will be set to establish deadlines for further pretrial development. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/24/2022. (kak)
March 16, 2022 Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David S. Cercone: Case Management Conference held on 3/16/2022.The Clerk met with counsel to discuss appropriate measures for pretrial development of the case and to assure that all prerequisites for the ADR process have been completed. Attorney Apessos designated liaison counsel for the ADR process. The parties have selected mediation to be conducted before Harry Paras, Esquire. Costs to be split 50/50. The ADR session must occur on or before June 3, 2022. A jury-trial CMO with phase 1 fact discovery through August 15, 2022, a Rule 502(d) order and an ADR referral order will follow. (Court Reporter: none) (mwm)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: the initial case management conference set for March 16, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. The Conference will be conducted telephonically. Counsel may participate in the Conference by dialing 866-390-1828 and entering access code 6977888 at the scheduled time. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/15/22. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (mwm)
February 25, 2022 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #7 Stipulation Selecting ADR process. ERROR: Stipulation Selecting ADR Process form is outdated. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to use the updated Stipulation Selecting ADR Process form, with the revision date of 4/2017, for future filings. The updated form can be found at the court's website, under the Forms link, at #here. This message is for informational purposes only. (pak)
February 22, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. (Swistak, Jennifer)
February 22, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Swistak, Jennifer)
February 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 3/16/2022 at 01:00 PM in Telephone Conference before Judge David S. Cercone. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 2/23/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/2/2022. Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 3/2/2022. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/3/2022. (kly)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint WITH AFFIRMATIVE AND ADDITIONAL DEFENSES by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. (Swistak, Jennifer)
January 26, 2022 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. (cww)
January 26, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-21-015206 with Jury Trial Demanded Copies attached: Complaint, Service Documents, Notice of Removal (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6919077), filed by STARBUCKS CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (cww)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCOTT v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DELGARDO SCOTT
Represented By: G. Christopher Apessos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Represented By: Jennifer M. Swistak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?