HALL v. ESTOCK et al
Petitioner: DESHAWN HALL
Respondent: LEE ESTOCK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Case Number: 2:2022cv00258
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING (ECF No. #11 ) Commonwealth's Petition for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Commonwealth shall file its Answer no later than May 6, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 04/06/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Brief in Support - Other filed by DESHAWN HALL, #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by DESHAWN HALL by ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, LEE ESTOCK. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wabby, Ronald)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, LEE ESTOCK. (Wabby, Ronald)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald M. Wabby, Jr on behalf of ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, LEE ESTOCK. (Wabby, Ronald)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/22/2022; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/22/2022; LEE ESTOCK served on 3/21/2022, answer due 4/22/2022. (pak)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Remark: Service copies were forwarded to the U.S. Marshal. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the (ECF. No. #4 ) Petition for Writ of Habeas upon the respondents, the Lee Estock, Superintendent at S.C.I. Pine Grove, the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as well as the District Attorney of Allegheny County, with costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The District Attorney shall address both the merits of the petition and exhaustion of state court remedies. The answer shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records, including all relevant transcripts, all briefs filed by petitioner, and all written opinions of the courts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days will constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 02/15/2022. (jmb)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668073404), filed by DESHAWN HALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (pak)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 24668073404 (pak)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus submitted by DESHAWN HALL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (pak)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (pak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HALL v. ESTOCK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DESHAWN HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LEE ESTOCK
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Represented By: Ronald M. Wabby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?