TILLAR v. SMITH et al
Petitioner: WILLIAM TILLAR
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Case Number: 2:2022cv00363
Filed: March 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Dodge
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that #4 MOTION to Stay by WILLIAM TILLAR is GRANTED. This case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until the conclusion of the litigation of Petitioner's current PCRA proceeding, including any appeal to a state appellate court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 4/20/2022. (mqe)
April 6, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Stay by WILLIAM TILLAR. (jv)
April 6, 2022 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668074385), filed by WILLIAM TILLAR. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (jv)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. The Petitioner may reopen this case by April 4, 2022 by curing the described deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 3/2/2022. (mqe)
March 1, 2022 Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Motion to Stay at bottom of Habeas Petition should by filed as w/petition) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TILLAR v. SMITH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WILLIAM TILLAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BARRY SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?